欢迎光临中英双语律师网!咨询热线 18930220709

专业法律服务

Professional Solution

中英双语律师网

Bilingual Lawyers

 语言之师      商务之友     成功之伴             Law and Practice in China  
兼并收购
公司运营
婚姻家庭
国际贸易
劳动雇佣
合同纠纷
知识产权
房产工程
刑事犯罪
Court backs Baidu against Qihoo
INTERNET security service provider Qihoo 360 was ordered to pay 700,000 yuan (US$113,506) to Baidu for breaking the industry rules on online search.
(Shanghai Daily By Ding Yining | August 8, 2014) INTERNET security service provider Qihoo 360 was ordered to pay 700,000 yuan (US$113,506) to Baidu for breaking the industry rules on online search.

The Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court found Qihoo involved in unfair competition as it took content from Baidu’s website, ignoring the Robots protocols, a widely accepted industry rule on online search.

The court found that Qihoo took Baidu’s content without the latter’s consent through its 360 Browser and search engine in August 2012.

Baidu sued Qihoo for unfair competition and initially demanded 100 million yuan as compensation. It demanded that Qihoo stop taking information from its website and online discussion forums.

The court heard the case in October last year.

Qihoo and Baidu have been involved in a number of conflicts as the companies battle it out for a share of the online search market.

The Robots protocols specify what kind of content can be accessed by external search engine sites.

Qihoo, a popular Internet security agency in China, claimed that Baidu was defaming its business operations through various media and filed a lawsuit in Beijing. The court has yet to pass a verdict in this case.

Earlier this year, the Supreme People’s Court ordered Qihoo to pay 5 million yuan in damages to rival Tencent for unfair competition.

Tencent claimed it suffered economic losses after Qihoo blocked users from installing Tencent’s related services, denying web users from viewing and subscribing to its value-added services. The lawsuit was regarded as the most important anti-monopoly spat between the two Internet giants.

法律之间冲突时的效力原则


正式的法的渊源的效力有时也被称为法律效力等级,或法律效力位阶。宪法(或根本法)属于第一层次,而民法、刑法、行政法、诉讼等基本法律属于第二层次,基本法律之下还可能有第三和第四层次的法律等等。不同位阶的法的渊源之间的冲突原则包括宪法至上原则、法律高于法规原则、法规高于规章原则、行政法规高于地方性法规原则等。


同一位阶的法的渊源之间的冲突原则,主要包括:(1)全国性法律优先原则。(2)特别法优先原则。(3)后法优先或新法优先原则。(4)实体法优先原则。(5)国际法优先原则。(6)省、自治区的人民政府制定的规章的效力高于本行政区域内的较大的市的人民政府制定的规章。


位阶出现交叉时的法的渊源之间的冲突原则,我国《立法法》主要规定:(1)自治条例和单行条例依法对法律、行政法规、地方性法规作变通规定的,在本自治地方适用自治条例和单行条例的规定。(2)经济特区法规根据授权对法律、行政法规、地方性法规作变通规定的,在本经济特区适用经济特区法规的规定。(3)地方性法规、规章之间不一致时,由有关机关依照各自的权限作出裁决。



263